Inside the VancouverSEO.com audit
Our first published project examines this website. The September 10, 2026 UTC audit reviewed all 71 sitemap pages and tested the homepage and SEO service page. It found working crawl essentials alongside thin service content, inconsistent redirect behaviour and an unlinked case-studies page.
The example is useful because it separates a measured baseline from a business outcome. The audit’s successful HTTP responses did not prove Google indexation, and its performance scores did not show a ranking increase.
What the published baseline shows
The homepage’s mobile Lighthouse performance score was 88/100 with a 3.3-second Largest Contentful Paint. The SEO service page scored 93 on mobile and 99 on desktop. These were individual laboratory runs, not field performance for the entire site.
The content review recorded approximately 269 main-content words on the SEO service page, 25 descriptions longer than 200 characters, and a case-studies page without an incoming internal link. These observations informed the content and technical work described in the project.
How to evaluate an SEO case study
Look for a starting point, dates, a defined scope of work and an explanation of the result. A chart should identify the metric and period. A change in traffic may reflect seasonality, other campaigns or search changes as well as the work described.
For a client project, qualified enquiries and commercial outcomes can be more useful than a single keyword screenshot. We discuss relevant experience and any approved evidence when you share your industry and challenge.
Related services and resources
Start with a clear next step
Share your website, your main services and the places you serve. We can use that context to discuss the right review and project scope.
Request a conversation ↗